An analysis of consequentialism and deontology in personal views

The thief, clad in a ski mask, makes a video of his act and posts it to YouTube. University of Chicago Press.

Ethical paradigms for moral analyses are helpful when there are two or more conflicting arguments of merit. Finally, consequentialism is criticized on the ground that it gives little or no guidance to persons' practical reasoning.

The best argument for rule-consequentialism is that it does a better job than its rivals of matching and tying together our moral convictions, as well as offering us help with our moral disagreements and uncertainties.

Nonetheless, although deontological theories can be agnostic regarding metaethics, some metaethical accounts seem less hospitable than others to deontology. Second, causings are distinguished from allowings. First, they can just bite the bullet and declare that sometimes doing what is morally right will have tragic results but that allowing such tragic results to occur is still the right thing to do.

Take the case of the YouTube thief. Others argue that any duty to obey the law depends on whether the law possesses practical authority, which for some is a contingent matter Razand for others is impossibility Hurd It strikes me as strange that abortion is so often presented as if it were forced upon people as being their only option in some case.

Stronger versions of negative consequentialism will require active intervention to prevent bad and ameliorate existing harm. They can simply endorse whatever system the social science tells us strikes the most efficient balance between the need for market competition, the need to give people incentives to innovate, and so on.

The victim of the theft will lament the loss of the pie, but that's nothing compared to the loss of your child's life. Content varies with different sections.

Moral Theories

Proseminar and writing-intensive in the Fall. Thomas Scanlon's contractualism, for example, which posits at its core those norms of action that we can justify to each other, seems as much an ontological and epistemological account of moral notions as an account of which particular acts are right or wrong.

And what do all of these tell us about the constitution of race, gender, age, sexuality and the putatively multicultural constitution of American society? See Article History Deontological ethics, in philosophyethical theories that place special emphasis on the relationship between duty and the morality of human actions.

At the very least, any moral theory needs to define the standpoint from which the goodness of the consequences are to be determined. Focusing on voice as it emerges and operates within the context of blackness, the course will focus on various black figures and various black expressions of voice as they relate to existential forms of liberation and empowerment.

If the purpose of public relations is to build relationships with publics, trust is an essential part of any ongoing relationship.

Deontological ethics

The most common form of utilitarianism in public relations management is specific to the act under consideration, considering it in all of its detail, including the potential consequences arising from different decision alternatives.

This view gets things wrong. As with the Doctrine of Double Effect, how plausible one finds these applications of the Doctrine of Doing and Allowing will determine how plausible one finds this cause-based view of human agency.

A consequentialist might want to say that the pains imposed on the opponents were weightier. Given the differing notions of rationality underlying each kind of theory, this is easier said than done.

Kantian Consequentialism

The five would be saved if the one escaped, was never on the track, or did not exist. Emphasis on reading philosophical and ritual texts in translation in order to understand the various ways that Confucians understood their place in Chinese society.

An analysis of consequentialism and deontology in personal views

For example, that participating in a crime can matter, even if the crime would have been committed anyway, or would even have been worse, without the agent's participation. Same as Neuroscience This gives great credence to deontology as a field of inquiry. Deontology takes time and study of the philosophy in order to implement its three tests correctly, just as you are doing here.

Consequentialists can and do differ widely in terms of specifying the Good. On the one hand, deontological morality, in contrast to consequentialism, leaves space for agents to give special concern to their families, friends, and projects.

Similarly, the patient-centered deontologist may reject the comparability of states of affairs that involve more or fewer usings Brook Scientific background welcome but not required.

The analysis of competing and valid decisions is a difficult, exceedingly complex pursuit. Lloyd defend his position from this sort of objection? Examines the historical progression of feminist philosophical thought, as well as some of the debates that animate contemporary feminist theory.Perhaps the most familiar form of consequentialism is classical hedonistic act utilitarianism, which claims, roughly, that an agent ought to perform that action, among the available alternatives, that produces the most net pleasure (pleasure, less pain) for everyone concerned.

The primary difference between deontology and utilitarianism, two competing systems of ethics, is that the former system is concerned with whether an act is intrinsically right or wrong, while the latter system believes that only the consequences of an act are important.

Nov 18,  · Utilitarianism and consequentialism are different, yet closely related philosophical positions. Utilitarians are usually consequentialists, and the two views mesh in many areas, but each rests on a different claim, so I shall try to deal with them Rationally Speaking.

Compare and contrast utilitarianism and deontology. Utilitarianism is the principle that the correct form of action be taken to benefit the greatest number of people. Deontology is defined as the area of ethics involving the responsibility, moral duty and commitment. This paper identifies the different normative ethical arguments stated and suggested by Arjuna and Krishna in the Gītā, analyzes those arguments, examines the interrelations between those arguments, and demonstrates that, contrary to a common view, both Arjuna and Krishna advance ethical theories.

Deontology vs. Consequentialism Essay Sample Even though Deontology and Consequentialism can be extremely similar, both contain key factors that make each idea unique and very different.

Difference Between Utilitarianism and Deontology

Sometimes, it may appear that both these theories simply arrive at the same conclusion by way of different paths.

An analysis of consequentialism and deontology in personal views
Rated 3/5 based on 20 review